Rexx Tool To Check Coding Standards Delphi

by
Rexx Tool To Check Coding Standards Delphi Average ratng: 3,8/5 3633 votes

I am looking for an rexx tool which will check whether a cobol program is written on a standard basis or not.means it will check for indentation and Para naming order like perform 2000-para should be before perform 3000-para and shouldn't be the reverse.And the section checking.If file is used then should be in the select-assign clause,FD section and properly open,write and close.

Hello everyone,I am quite new to REXX and I am assigned to develop a rexx tool which should check if the programmer has followed cobol standards. In the process I need to check the following for which I need some help and your valuable inputsa)A Para must have a period only at the end of it, I need to find a way to identify if it's not followedb)All the paragraphs must have an exit Para with an exit statementC)usage of negative conditional statements need to be identified.Looking forward to your inputs or ideas. Posts: 6 Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 9:00 pm Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time. Read the program using EXECIO and save to a stem variable.2. Foxconn 45cmx audio drivers for windows 7 download.

Make multiple passes through all of the program statements. The first pass is to remove any comments. That is, replace with blanks.

I have had problems with language keywords being in comments. Possibly also translate other statements to uppercase.3. Use a 'Do' loop to scan all program statements.4 Examine each program statement.

Hakeem muzaffar hussain awan books 2017 His books like Deen Hama Oost, Faiz e Nisbat, Rang e Nizam, Arsh e Naz, etc. Very like by the people.This book is a collection of Urdu Ghazals by Pir Naseer Ud Din. Pir Naseer Ud Din was an author of many books on various subjects like Sufism, poetry, and the Islamic Shariah. The author of the book considered a great poet of Naat in the current era.

Use the POS built-in function to see if a particular keyword is in the current statement. Then use PARSE to look for proper syntax. I am quite new to REXX and I am assigned to develop a rexx toolSigh. The rule of thumb I was taught in college classes is that writing a tool is 3 times as hard as writing an application program, and writing a compiler is 3 times as hard as writing a tool. This is assuming, of course, that the tool will be generic and usable by everyone in the applications development group at your site. How much experience do you have in writing COBOL programs?And are you going to be checking for NEXT SENTENCE as well in your tool? Global moderator Posts: 3634 Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:32 pm Location: Dubuque, Iowa, USA Has thanked: time Been thanked: times.

I always point out it is easier to use the listing - or even request the ADATA output from the compiler, although for your three tasks that is perhaps overkill.The negation is easy. After proceeding with the listing following Pedro's scheme, the only negation possible is NOT and FALSE (for EVALUATE).For the exit-paragraph being present (assuming the programs don't also have multiple other paragraphs) you just match pairs of paragraph-names on the cross-reference. The cross-reference will note those that are used in a PERFORM so you can even check that the THRU exists from that.The easiest part is the full-stops/periods. Count them all, starting from the PROCEDURE DIVISION header. That has one. Each paragraph-name has one. Then you should have one for each paragraph (so you know how many to expect).

Any deviation from the expected total means more than one in a paragraph. You don't have to worry about a paragraph not having one, because that gives a compiler diagnostic anyway.Have to point out that not using negation and using THRU are both. But fairly common.Robert's point about the NEXT SENTENCE is worth following up on.

If you only allow one full-stop/period per paragraph you definitely need to check no-one is using NEXT SENTENCE. Global moderator Posts: 3804 Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:02 am Has thanked: times Been thanked: times. Hi Billy,Thanks for taking the time out.' The easiest part is the full-stops/periods. Count them all, starting from the PROCEDURE DIVISION header. That has one.

Each paragraph-name has one. Then you should have one for each paragraph (so you know how many to expect). Any deviation from the expected total means more than one in a paragraph. You don't have to worry about a paragraph not having one, because that gives a compiler diagnostic anyway.' I need to identify the paragraph having multiple periods as well,Coz I am writing the discrepancies in a report and it would be better for me to write the para name there.Your's and Robert's point about NEXT SENTENCE is very valid,I will probably add it Posts: 6 Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 9:00 pm Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time.